Norton AntiVirus 2008, Good or bad?

I was just wondering if its a good software im prolly going to pick it up today?

Norton AntiVirus 2008, Good or bad?antispyware

According to CNET.com, one of the top technology websites, the best Anti-virus software is Kaspersky Antivirus.

CNET 2007 antivirus performance test scores

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6600_7-6655...

Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7 Review

http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-securit...

For comparasion, here is the review for Norton Antivirus 2008:

http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-securit...

Norton AntiVirus 2008, Good or bad?best antivirus software

switch to linux and save a ton of money
Don't buy it, get Kaspersky instead. The best anti-virus is ESET NOD32 then Kaspersky. NOD32 is the only anti-virus that got an Advanced+ rating in tests conducted at http://www.av-comparatives.org/

The most popular free anti-virus programs (AVG and Avast) have poor detection rates (82.82%, 87.46% respectively). Norton is notoriously bloated and takes forever to perform full systems scans.

I only recommend buying NOD32 (advanced users) or Kaspersky. It has been proven these products are better than the best sellers (Norton and McAfee):

http://www.consumersearch.com/www/softwa...
Good.

Norton Internet Security 2008 is better.

It's a total protectin program.

Spamfilter, Antivirus, Firewall, and more.
Norton is the worst and a source hog. Yes NOD 32 is better than Kaspersky but Zone Alarm Internet Security Suite is the best. I have tested them back to back and ZA rose victorious.
if your going to get norton go with the 360 version. but Kaspersky, Zone Alarm I/S, and Nod32 are the best ways to go. Besides norton takes up so much memory and slows down your computer
I would not get Norton, its the worst antivirus program you can go for. Get something like Nod32, or Avast antivirus ( Home Edition free)....

Regards Jase